1
Truth table for p∣p:
| interpretation | p | p∥p |
|---|
| v0 | 0 | 1 |
| v1 | 1 | 0 |
-
Let ¬A be A∣A.
-
Let A∧B be (A∣B)∣(A∣B).
| A | B | A∣B | (A∣B)∣(A∣B) |
|---|
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
-
Let A∨B be (A∣A)∣(B∣B).
| a | b | b∣b | a∣a | (a∣a)∣(b∣b) |
|---|
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
-
Let A→B be A∣(B∣B).
| a | b | b∣b | a∣(b∣b) |
|---|
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
2
Consider (p∨(¬r))→(¬((¬q)∨r))
| interpretation | p | r | q | ¬q | (¬q)∨r | ¬((¬q)∨r) | ¬r | p∨(¬r) | (p∨(¬r))→(¬((¬q)∨r)) |
|---|
| v0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| v1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| v2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| v3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| v4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| v5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| v6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| v7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
i
a. Write in CNF:
¬((¬p∧¬r∧¬q)∨(p∧¬r∧¬q)∨(p∧r∧¬q)∨(p∧r∧q))=¬((¬r∧¬q)∨(p∧r))=¬(¬(r∨q)∨¬¬(p∧r))=¬(¬(r∨q)∨¬(¬p∨¬r))=¬¬((r∨q)∧(¬p∨¬r))=(r∨q)∧(¬p∨¬r)
b. Write in DNF:
(¬P∧¬Q∧R)∨(¬P∧Q∧¬R)∨(¬P∧Q∧R)∨(P∧Q∧¬R)(¬p∧¬r∧q)∨(¬p∧r∧¬q)∨(¬p∧r∧q)∨(p∧¬r∧q)=(¬p∧((¬r∧q))∨(r∧¬q)∨(r∧q))∨(p∧¬r∧q)=(¬r∧q)∨r∨(p∧¬r∧q)=(¬r∧q)∨r
ii
Rewrite (p∨(¬r))→(¬((¬q)∨r)) to DNF using the rewrite rules.
(P∨Q∨R)∧(¬P∨Q∨R)∧(¬P∨Q∨¬R)∧(¬P∨¬Q∨¬R)p∨¬rp∨¬rp∨¬r¬(p∨¬r)(¬p∧r)→¬(¬q∨r)→¬¬q∧¬r→q∧¬r∨(q∧¬r)∨(q∧¬r)
3
Rewrite the following propositional formula:
(P→Q)∧¬(S→R)
i. In CNF:
(P→Q)¬P∧Q¬P∧Q∧¬(S→R)∧¬(¬S∨R)∧S∧¬R
ii. In DNF:
(P→Q)¬P∧Q(¬P∧S∧¬R)∧¬(S→R)∧S∧¬R∨(Q∧S∧¬R)
See Distributive laws (Logic).